Facts are the source of science but in Africa case science does not need facts
I was there when the AIDS first came into the mainstream decision for I was following every things that was said. 24 case in US and others in France. Then the scientist said it came from Haiti, when Haiti has no case. Then sudden it came from Africa, when no case in Africa. That is how the Africa origin starts.
So when you read document saying that in 1970’s 30, 000 died in Africa of Aids is lie the scientist them are telling, its just to justify the false origin.
They first start with the slim diseases; that a slim person in Africa, the runners you see today are so because they have aids. No one question these moral cowards calling themselves scientist. Even in the 19’s the Aids conference in London was the same. There foundation was, that all Aids origin in Africa based on is:
“We do not know for sure where Aids came from, but its commonly believe that it came from Africa.”
That’s it. No evidence; a six grade teacher would not accepted that from her student.
Do not look for truth From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, Look for facts in written documents printed between 1982 to 1984, after that the scientist began to change their tune to justify an African origin.
What is Aids? Aids is reaction in the human bio mechanics
Aids is a reaction that has some resemblance to cancer, but its not cancer. Cancer also has its genesis in chemical which came over along period of time from livable chemicals in small doses. Aids on the other hand came sudden. Cancer can be pass on to the children without notice because the white blood cells were able to defended the immune system but when the child exposed themselves to their own small doses in the course of time those small doses became full dose and over power the defense of the white blood cells. That is when it is said that a person have cancer. Aids on the other hand injected into the blood stream that destroys the white cells instantly.
Bio-evolution teaches that primary diseases do not come sudden, rather there are always lots of secondary front runners. Mad Cow, Bird Flu, and H1N1, were all low end diseases, not high end like aids. They were front runners, but because they were stop then there will be no high end to follow; because it is the secondary low end diseases that evolved into primary high end diseases. So where are aids front runners?
The evidence shows that monkeys in Africa does not naturally carry the strain for aids, only the single monkey that show to have aids, which is a lab monkey. No other animal in Africa that eats monkeys have the aids strain, which again its impossible, the food chain was not affected, testify that aids came from an isolated environment. If aids did came from monkey in Africa there would be no life left in Africa long before 1980; because the secondary front runner would long wiped the population out much less its evolved into a big and primary as aids.
It would have contaminated the entire food chain. Aids came from a lab monkey in the America Russia cold war weaponry development program, and it was test a human and things went out of control and as cowards they blame the innocent, Africa. I believe the records on the genesis on the development of AIDS is lock away some where and soon are later some one will make the truth know. Aids is a chemical reaction, not a disease